The more we learn about human DNA the more apparent it becomes that Darwinists are blowing hot air with their claims that some apelike creature lurks in man’s ancestral closet.
Scientists who study such things say that human DNA molecules EACH contain enough hereditary data to fill a 500,000-page book. This data is translated by enzymes, all of which are encoded to protect against mutational defects. Both the genetic data and the enzymes that decode the information had to be there from the very start.
For this reason, gradual evolution makes no sense at all.
Still, Darwinists teach that mankind evolved over long periods of time from some sort of an unknown apelike ancestor, often claiming that Human DNA is 98% the same as the DNA found in a chimpanzee.
Let’s examine the truth and determine if this claim has any integrity or validity.
As far as the integrity of this claim, it was based on only about 1% of the total genome. The 1% that was compared was the part controlling body design. Since people and apes have two arms and two legs, the fact that this portion of their DNA strands is rather similar was to be expected. To promote the claim that this proves we are 98% the same in our overall DNA as a chimpanzee is plainly dishonest and highly misleading.
So what about the viability of the claim that people evolved from apes?
Nature magazine has reported that as real science gets into the genome the wider the gap in genetic similarities becomes between man and ape. In fact, scientific studies reveal that there is at least a 7.7% difference between ape DNA and human DNA.
How big of a difference is that?
Well, consider that you contain about three billion base pairs of genetic information in every single one of your DNA-carrying cells throughout your entire body (Do you really think that this kind of complex data formed without any intelligence behind it?).
Just a 7.7% difference between a human’s genetic data and the gene pool found in a chimpanzee would mathematically require 231,000,000 beneficial and new genetic-information-adding mutations to take place in order to change a chimp into a human.
But not even ONE is possible.
Keep these two facts in mind:
First, science knows of no way for nature to add appreciable amounts of new and beneficial genetic information to an existing gene pool.
Second, so many mutations are fatal that there is no mathematical possibility of stringing together 231 million in a row without exterminating the potential evolving individual.
So why don’t Darwinists stop promoting misleading information and just bring out the real evidence that we evolved from a single-celled creature?
Because there is not any real evidence to back up their claims.